Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

The effect of repeated surface treatment of zirconia on its bond strength to resin cement

Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics 2020³â 12±Ç 5È£ p.291 ~ 298
Maciel Lucas Campagnaro, Amaral Marina, Queiroz Daher Antonio, Baroudi Kusai, Silva-Concilio Lais Regiane,
¼Ò¼Ó »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
 ( Maciel Lucas Campagnaro ) - University of Taubate School of Dentistry Postgraduate Program
 ( Amaral Marina ) - University of Taubate School of Dentistry Department of Dental Prosthesis
 ( Queiroz Daher Antonio ) - Ohio State University College of Dentistry Division of Restorative and Prosthetic Dentistry
 ( Baroudi Kusai ) - University of Taubate School of Dentistry Postgraduate Program
 ( Silva-Concilio Lais Regiane ) - University of Taubate School of Dentistry Department of Dental Prosthesis

Abstract


PURPOSE: The aim of this study is to evaluate the influence of repeated surface treatments on wettability and surface roughness for zirconia surface and bond strength of zirconia-based ceramics to resin cement.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: Seventy blocks (10 ¡¿ 10 ¡¿ 3 mm) of zirconia-based ceramics were fabricated and divided into two groups according to the surface treatments: (A) 110 ¥ìm Al2O3 airborne-particle abrasion and (R) 110 ¥ìm silica modified Al2O3 airborne-particle abrasion. At stage 2, each group was subdivided into 5 groups according to the surface retreatments: (a) 110 ¥ìm Al2O3 airborne-particle abrasion, (r) 110 ¥ìm silica modified Al2O3 airborne-particle abrasion, (D) diamond bur, (Da) diamond bur + 110 ¥ìm Al2O3 airborne-particle abrasion, and (Dr) diamond bur + 110 ¥ìm silica modified Al2O3 airborne-particle abrasion. Cylinders of self-adhesive resin cement were cemented onto each treated ceramic surface and subjected to micro-shear bond strength test. Additional specimens were prepared for roughness and wettability analyses. The data were subjected to t-test and One-way ANOVA followed by Tukey's post hoc test (¥á=.05).

RESULTS: At stage 1, group R presented higher bond strength values than group A (P=.000). There was a statistically significant increase of bond strength at stage 2 for group A (P=.003). The diamond bur influenced the surface roughness, increasing the values (P=.023). Group R provided better wettability. Regardless of the applied surface treatment, most of failures were adhesive.

CONCLUSION: The combination of application and reapplication of Rocatec Plus showed the best results of bond strength. Surface retreatment and recementation might be an indicated clinical strategy.

Å°¿öµå

Bond strength; Zirconia; Surface roughness; Wettability; Surface treatment

¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸

 

µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸

SCI(E)
KCI
KoreaMed